Exact observations across the evidence lenses

This is an evidence ledger, not a ranking. Different rows have different populations, periods and question bases. The structured JSON retains fuller methodological notes.

SourceMeasure / geographyPeriodValueBase / definitionReference
mckinseyEnterprise-wide AI scaling
2025 survey wave; geographic coverage not verified in this extract
202538 percentSurvey respondents reporting on their organisationsSource
mckinseyEnterprise-wide AI scaling
97-nation survey
202644 percentSurvey respondents reporting on their organisationsSource
mckinseyLarge organisations
2025 survey wave; geographic coverage not verified in this extract
202527 percentRespondents at organisations with annual revenue >$1billionSource
mckinseySmaller organisations
2025 survey wave; geographic coverage not verified in this extract
202522 percentRespondents at smaller organisations; large defined as annual revenue >$1billionSource
mckinseyLarge organisations
97-nation survey
202640 percentRespondents at organisations with annual revenue >$1billionSource
mckinseySmaller organisations
97-nation survey
202622 percentRespondents at smaller organisations; large defined as annual revenue >$1billionSource
mckinseyImproved own productivity
97-nation survey
202680 percentSurvey respondents describing their own productivitySource
mckinseyPositive organisational EBIT contribution
97-nation survey
202637 percentSurvey respondents answering the enterprise EBIT impact questionSource
mckinseyAI in three or more functions
2025 survey wave; geographic coverage not verified in this extract
202551 percentSurvey respondents reporting on their organisationsSource
mckinseyAI in three or more functions
97-nation survey
202656 percentSurvey respondents reporting on their organisationsSource
gallupWeekly or daily AI use
United States
Jan–Mar202628 percentAll surveyed US employees; full sample n=15,482Source
gallupNever used AI in their role
United States
Jan–Mar202654 percentAll surveyed US employees; full sample n=15,482Source
gallupCollege graduates
United States
Jan–Mar202640 percentUS employees with a college degreeSource
gallupWithout a college degree
United States
Jan–Mar202617 percentUS employees without a college degreeSource
gallupManagers
United States
Jan–Mar202637 percentUS employees in management rolesSource
gallupIndividual contributors
United States
Jan–Mar202625 percentUS employees in individual-contributor rolesSource
gallupWork faster
United States
Jan–Mar202663 percentAI-using employees; at least a few times in prior year; n=7,845Source
gallupFind more creative solutions
United States
Jan–Mar202656 percentAI-using employees; at least a few times in prior year; n=7,845Source
gallupMore time for interesting work
United States
Jan–Mar202647 percentAI-using employees; at least a few times in prior year; n=7,845Source
gallupProduce higher-quality work
United States
Jan–Mar202646 percentAI-using employees; at least a few times in prior year; n=7,845Source
gallupEmployer asks for more responsibility
United States
Jan–Mar202631 percentAI-using employees; at least a few times in prior year; n=7,845Source
anthropicExplanations / answers
International Claude chat/Cowork sample
10Apr–10Jun202617 percentSampled Claude chat/Cowork conversationsSource 9
anthropicDocuments / reports
International Claude chat/Cowork sample
10Apr–10Jun202615 percentSampled Claude chat/Cowork conversationsSource 9
anthropicGuidance
International Claude chat/Cowork sample
10Apr–10Jun202611 percentSampled Claude chat/Cowork conversationsSource 9
anthropicWork conversations
International Claude chat/Cowork sample
10Apr–10Jun202620 percentConversations within the indicated purpose categorySource 12
anthropicCoursework conversations
International Claude chat/Cowork sample
10Apr–10Jun202621 percentConversations within the indicated purpose categorySource 12
anthropicPersonal conversations
International Claude chat/Cowork sample
10Apr–10Jun20266 percentConversations within the indicated purpose categorySource 12
anthropicWork
International Claude chat/Cowork sample
May202643.36 percentGlobal sampled Claude chat/Cowork conversations in calendar May2026Source
anthropicPersonal
International Claude chat/Cowork sample
May202640.2 percentGlobal sampled Claude chat/Cowork conversations in calendar May2026Source
anthropicCoursework
International Claude chat/Cowork sample
May202616.45 percentGlobal sampled Claude chat/Cowork conversations in calendar May2026Source
hepi2026Used AI for at least one purpose
United Kingdom
202466 percentFull-time UK undergraduatesSource 10
hepi2026Used AI for at least one purpose
United Kingdom
202592 percentFull-time UK undergraduatesSource 10
hepi2026Used AI for at least one purpose
United Kingdom
202695 percentFull-time UK undergraduatesSource 10
hepi2026Used generative AI to help with assessed work
United Kingdom
202694 percentFull-time UK undergraduatesSource 14
hepi2026Said institution provides generative AI tools
United Kingdom
20249 percentFull-time UK undergraduatesSource 35
hepi2026Said institution provides generative AI tools
United Kingdom
202523 percentFull-time UK undergraduatesSource 35
hepi2026Said institution provides generative AI tools
United Kingdom
202638 percentFull-time UK undergraduatesSource 35
hepi2026Agreed AI skills are essential to thrive
United Kingdom
202668 percentFull-time UK undergraduatesSource 30
hepi2026Agreed teaching staff help develop AI skills for future career
United Kingdom
202648 percentFull-time UK undergraduatesSource 31
nlt_young2026Had used generative AI
United Kingdom; sample heavily England-based
202566.5 percentSurveyed 13–18-year-olds who had heard of generative AISource 7
nlt_young2026Had used generative AI
United Kingdom; sample heavily England-based
202679.0 percentSurveyed 13–18-year-olds who had heard of generative AISource 7
nlt_young2026Check AI outputs for accuracy
United Kingdom; sample heavily England-based
202652.3 percentSurveyed 13–18-year-olds who use AISource 13
nlt_young2026Add own thoughts to AI outputs
United Kingdom; sample heavily England-based
202656.5 percentSurveyed 13–18-year-olds who use AISource 13
nlt_young2026Usually copy AI output when using it for homework
United Kingdom; sample heavily England-based
202624.1 percentSurveyed 13–18-year-olds who use AISource 13
nlt_young2026Usually copy AI output for homework: FSM
United Kingdom; sample heavily England-based
202631.6 percentAI-using surveyed 13–18-year-olds in the FSM subgroupSource 14
nlt_young2026Usually copy AI output for homework: Non-FSM
United Kingdom; sample heavily England-based
202622.4 percentAI-using surveyed 13–18-year-olds in the Non-FSM subgroupSource 14
nlt_teachers2026Had used generative AI
United Kingdom survey
202558.0 percentSurveyed teachers who had heard of generative AISource 7
nlt_teachers2026Had used generative AI
United Kingdom survey
202680.6 percentSurveyed teachers who had heard of generative AISource 7
nlt_teachers2026Received AI training or support through school
United Kingdom survey
202632.6 percentSurveyed teachers who had heard of generative AISource 20
nlt_teachers2026Use AI for lesson resources, quizzes or tests
United Kingdom survey
202673.2 percentSurveyed teachers using generative AI at least monthlySource 9
nlt_teachers2026Use AI to assess work or create a marking rubric
United Kingdom survey
20269.1 percentSurveyed teachers using generative AI at least monthlySource 9
nlt_parents2026Families that had used AI together
United Kingdom research programme
202667.8 percentSurveyed parents of children aged 5–18 reporting family activitySource
nlt_parents2026Agreed child should learn about AI at school
United Kingdom research programme
202662.5 percentSurveyed parents of children aged 5–18Source
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
England
202679.2 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
Wales
202674.9 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
Scotland
202676.4 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
Northern Ireland
202678.0 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
North East
202678.2 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
North West
202678.4 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
Yorkshire and the Humber
202679.7 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
East Midlands
202679.8 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
West Midlands
202679.2 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
East of England
202680.5 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
London
202682.1 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
South East
202679.0 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
nlt_young2026Young people reporting generative AI use
South West
202676.2 percentParticipating 13–18-year-olds in this geography who responded to the generative-AI use questionSource 28
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
European Union - 27 countries (from 2020)
20217.65 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
European Union - 27 countries (from 2020)
20238.06 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
European Union - 27 countries (from 2020)
202413.48 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
European Union - 27 countries (from 2020)
202519.95 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Belgium
202110.32 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Belgium
202313.81 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Belgium
202424.71 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Belgium
202534.54 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Bulgaria
20213.29 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Bulgaria
20233.62 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Bulgaria
20246.47 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Bulgaria
20258.55 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Czechia
20214.46 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Czechia
20235.9 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Czechia
202411.26 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Czechia
202517.6 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Denmark
202123.89 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Denmark
202315.17 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Denmark
202427.58 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Denmark
202542.03 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Germany
202110.56 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Germany
202311.55 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Germany
202419.75 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Germany
202525.97 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Estonia
20212.77 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Estonia
20235.19 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Estonia
202413.89 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Estonia
202523.4 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Ireland
20217.88 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Ireland
20238.01 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Ireland
202414.9 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Ireland
202519.64 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Greece
20212.61 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Greece
20233.98 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Greece
20249.81 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Greece
20258.93 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Spain
20217.67 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Spain
20239.18 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Spain
202411.31 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Spain
202520.27 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
France
20216.67 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
France
20235.88 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
France
20249.91 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
France
202518.16 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Croatia
20218.74 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Croatia
20237.89 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Croatia
202411.76 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Croatia
202515.19 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Italy
20216.17 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Italy
20235.05 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Italy
20248.2 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Italy
202516.4 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Cyprus
20212.59 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Cyprus
20234.67 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Cyprus
20247.9 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Cyprus
20259.27 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Latvia
20213.72 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Latvia
20234.53 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Latvia
20248.83 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Latvia
202512.21 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Lithuania
20214.45 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Lithuania
20234.86 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Lithuania
20248.76 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Lithuania
202521.3 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Luxembourg
202113.0 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Luxembourg
202314.45 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Luxembourg
202423.73 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Luxembourg
202533.61 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Hungary
20212.98 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Hungary
20233.68 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Hungary
20247.41 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Hungary
202510.37 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Malta
202110.16 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Malta
202313.17 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Malta
202417.3 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Malta
202521.51 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Netherlands
202113.1 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Netherlands
202314.1 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Netherlands
202423.06 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Netherlands
202533.21 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Austria
20218.83 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Austria
202310.79 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Austria
202420.27 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Austria
202529.95 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Poland
20212.86 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Poland
20233.67 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Poland
20245.9 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Poland
20258.36 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Portugal
20217.2 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Portugal
20237.86 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Portugal
20248.63 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Portugal
202511.54 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Romania
20211.38 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Romania
20231.51 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Romania
20243.07 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Romania
20255.21 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Slovenia
202111.73 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Slovenia
202311.37 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Slovenia
202420.89 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Slovenia
202521.61 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Slovakia
20215.19 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Slovakia
20237.04 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Slovakia
202410.78 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Slovakia
202518.0 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Finland
202115.79 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Finland
202315.1 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Finland
202424.37 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Finland
202537.82 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Sweden
20219.92 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Sweden
202310.37 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Sweden
202425.09 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-aiUses at least one AI technology
Sweden
202535.04 percentEnterprises with 10 or more persons employed in economic activities covered by the Eurostat ICT enterprise survey (NACE Rev.2 C10-S951_X_K); not the whole economy.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-ai-sizeFrom 10 to 49 persons employed
EU27
202517.0 percentEnterprises in the stated size class in economic activities covered by Eurostat ICT enterprise survey.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-ai-sizeFrom 50 to 249 persons employed
EU27
202530.36 percentEnterprises in the stated size class in economic activities covered by Eurostat ICT enterprise survey.Source
eurostat-isoc-eb-ai-size250 persons employed or more
EU27
202555.03 percentEnterprises in the stated size class in economic activities covered by Eurostat ICT enterprise survey.Source
jrc146753Cultural and creative sectors, and media
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202113 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Cultural and creative sectors, and media
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202538 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Energy
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202118 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Energy
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202534 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Electronic communications
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202112 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Electronic communications
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202530 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Healthcare and pharmaceuticals (covered activities)
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
20217 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Healthcare and pharmaceuticals (covered activities)
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202523 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Defence, security and space (private activities)
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
20219 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Defence, security and space (private activities)
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202520 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Climate and environment
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
20217 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Climate and environment
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202516 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Manufacturing, engineering and construction
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
20217 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Manufacturing, engineering and construction
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202516 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Agri-food (covered activities)
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
20215 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Agri-food (covered activities)
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202513 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Tourism
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
20213 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Tourism
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202513 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Mobility, transport and automotive
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
20216 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
jrc146753Mobility, transport and automotive
EU27 eligible strategic-sector firms
202512 percentFirms with 10+ persons employed in the mapped activities covered by the survey, weighted by number of firms across constituent NACE activities.Source 11
dartmouth2026Mostly developed AI skills independently, outside formal coursework
United States
September 202679.3 percentWeighted US four-year college student sample; agree or strongly agree; each item N=1,003. Separate, overlapping agreement measures, not complements or an adoption rate. Weighted online-panel self-reports; working paper, peer review not verified. Design effects were not verified. No causal learning outcomes or direct comparison with HEPI.Table 12, PDF p. 22
dartmouth2026Professors and courses provided meaningful guidance on effective and ethical AI use
United States
September 202668.1 percentWeighted US four-year college student sample; agree or strongly agree; each item N=1,003. Separate, overlapping agreement measures, not complements or an adoption rate. Weighted online-panel self-reports; working paper, peer review not verified. Design effects were not verified. No causal learning outcomes or direct comparison with HEPI.Table 12, PDF p. 22
dartmouth2026Institution adequately prepares students for AI use in their future career
United States
September 202649.5 percentWeighted US four-year college student sample; agree or strongly agree; each item N=1,003. Separate, overlapping agreement measures, not complements or an adoption rate. Weighted online-panel self-reports; working paper, peer review not verified. Design effects were not verified. No causal learning outcomes or direct comparison with HEPI.Table 12, PDF p. 22
uk_ai_adoption2026Current AI use, including pilots — All eligible businesses
United Kingdom
7 January–21 April 202632 percentUK private-sector businesses with at least five employees in SIC A–N and R–S; All eligible businesses. 3,503 telephone interviews with technology-responsible respondents; Market Location commercial sampling frame; weighted by business size and sector; 5% response rate. Broad AI, including pilots, not only generative AI. Selected sectors and a five-employee threshold differ from Eurostat; no direct UK–EU ranking. Self-reports, not a census or causal productivity evidence. Low response creates nonresponse risk; weighting does not establish its absence. The report compares 32% with 16% in the prior wave. These are repeated cross-sections, not a panel; questionnaire and achieved samples changed.ODS Table 27; PDF figures 1–2
uk_ai_adoption2026Current AI use, including pilots — Micro · 5–9 employees
United Kingdom
7 January–21 April 202627 percentUK private-sector businesses with at least five employees in SIC A–N and R–S; Micro · 5–9 employees. 3,503 telephone interviews with technology-responsible respondents; Market Location commercial sampling frame; weighted by business size and sector; 5% response rate. Broad AI, including pilots, not only generative AI. Selected sectors and a five-employee threshold differ from Eurostat; no direct UK–EU ranking. Self-reports, not a census or causal productivity evidence. Low response creates nonresponse risk; weighting does not establish its absence. The report compares 32% with 16% in the prior wave. These are repeated cross-sections, not a panel; questionnaire and achieved samples changed.ODS Table 27; PDF figures 1–2
uk_ai_adoption2026Current AI use, including pilots — Small · 10–49 employees
United Kingdom
7 January–21 April 202634 percentUK private-sector businesses with at least five employees in SIC A–N and R–S; Small · 10–49 employees. 3,503 telephone interviews with technology-responsible respondents; Market Location commercial sampling frame; weighted by business size and sector; 5% response rate. Broad AI, including pilots, not only generative AI. Selected sectors and a five-employee threshold differ from Eurostat; no direct UK–EU ranking. Self-reports, not a census or causal productivity evidence. Low response creates nonresponse risk; weighting does not establish its absence. The report compares 32% with 16% in the prior wave. These are repeated cross-sections, not a panel; questionnaire and achieved samples changed.ODS Table 27; PDF figures 1–2
uk_ai_adoption2026Current AI use, including pilots — Medium · 50–249 employees
United Kingdom
7 January–21 April 202647 percentUK private-sector businesses with at least five employees in SIC A–N and R–S; Medium · 50–249 employees. 3,503 telephone interviews with technology-responsible respondents; Market Location commercial sampling frame; weighted by business size and sector; 5% response rate. Broad AI, including pilots, not only generative AI. Selected sectors and a five-employee threshold differ from Eurostat; no direct UK–EU ranking. Self-reports, not a census or causal productivity evidence. Low response creates nonresponse risk; weighting does not establish its absence. The report compares 32% with 16% in the prior wave. These are repeated cross-sections, not a panel; questionnaire and achieved samples changed.ODS Table 27; PDF figures 1–2
uk_ai_adoption2026Current AI use, including pilots — Large · 250+ employees
United Kingdom
7 January–21 April 202652 percentUK private-sector businesses with at least five employees in SIC A–N and R–S; Large · 250+ employees. 3,503 telephone interviews with technology-responsible respondents; Market Location commercial sampling frame; weighted by business size and sector; 5% response rate. Broad AI, including pilots, not only generative AI. Selected sectors and a five-employee threshold differ from Eurostat; no direct UK–EU ranking. Self-reports, not a census or causal productivity evidence. Low response creates nonresponse risk; weighting does not establish its absence. The report compares 32% with 16% in the prior wave. These are repeated cross-sections, not a panel; questionnaire and achieved samples changed.ODS Table 27; PDF figures 1–2
uk_ai_adoption2026Limited AI skills, expertise or knowledge prevent adoption — nonusers planning adoption
United Kingdom
7 January–21 April 202678 percentUK private-sector businesses with at least five employees in SIC A–N and R–S; nonusers planning future adoption; unweighted base 236. 3,503 telephone interviews with technology-responsible respondents; Market Location commercial sampling frame; weighted by business size and sector; 5% response rate. Broad AI, including pilots, not only generative AI. Selected sectors and a five-employee threshold differ from Eurostat; no direct UK–EU ranking. Self-reports, not a census or causal productivity evidence. Low response creates nonresponse risk; weighting does not establish its absence. Routed subgroup, not all businesses or current adopters; not the 67% past-barrier measure among current users.ODS Table 61; PDF figure 22
reuters_genai2026Weekly use of standalone generative AI tools — six countries202534 percentAll respondents in the same six countries (Argentina, Denmark, France, Japan, United Kingdom and United States); n=12,565. YouGov online questionnaire; nonprobability samples with quotas and weighting for age, gender, region, education and political leaning. Combined-respondent estimates use YouGov weights, not an unweighted average of country percentages. Self-reported use and exposure, subject to recall and interpretation; online samples underrepresent people offline. No conventional sampling margin of error; not a worldwide estimate or directly comparable with Microsoft usage estimates. Different country sets and questions mean the weekly-use and search-exposure figures must not be subtracted as an exposure gap. Weekly-use comparison covers the same six countries, not a longitudinal panel. The prompted standalone-tool list changed from 13 tools in 2025 to 14 in 2026; this qualification accompanies the trend.Figure 1; printed p.12
reuters_genai2026Weekly use of standalone generative AI tools — six countries202651 percentAll respondents in the same six countries (Argentina, Denmark, France, Japan, United Kingdom and United States); n=12,774. YouGov online questionnaire; nonprobability samples with quotas and weighting for age, gender, region, education and political leaning. Combined-respondent estimates use YouGov weights, not an unweighted average of country percentages. Self-reported use and exposure, subject to recall and interpretation; online samples underrepresent people offline. No conventional sampling margin of error; not a worldwide estimate or directly comparable with Microsoft usage estimates. Different country sets and questions mean the weekly-use and search-exposure figures must not be subtracted as an exposure gap. Weekly-use comparison covers the same six countries, not a longitudinal panel. The prompted standalone-tool list changed from 13 tools in 2025 to 14 in 2026; this qualification accompanies the trend.Figure 1; printed p.12
reuters_genai2026AI-generated answers or assistants encountered in search engines in the previous week — nine countries202657 percentAll respondents across nine countries (Argentina, Denmark, France, Japan, United Kingdom and United States, plus Australia, Finland and Norway); n=18,921. YouGov online questionnaire; nonprobability samples with quotas and weighting for age, gender, region, education and political leaning. Combined-respondent estimates use YouGov weights, not an unweighted average of country percentages. Self-reported use and exposure, subject to recall and interpretation; online samples underrepresent people offline. No conventional sampling margin of error; not a worldwide estimate or directly comparable with Microsoft usage estimates. Different country sets and questions mean the weekly-use and search-exposure figures must not be subtracted as an exposure gap. Includes deliberate engagement and incidental exposure within search engines; not a measure of all incidental AI exposure.Figure 5; printed p.16
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Burgenland
Burgenland, Austria
202518.33 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F28
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Lower Austria
Lower Austria, Austria
202521.81 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F29
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Vienna
Vienna, Austria
202537.36 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F30
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Carinthia
Carinthia, Austria
202523.63 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F31
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Styria
Styria, Austria
202525.55 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F32
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Upper Austria
Upper Austria, Austria
202532.93 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F33
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Salzburg
Salzburg, Austria
202531.45 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F34
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Tyrol
Tyrol, Austria
202530.28 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F35
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Vorarlberg
Vorarlberg, Austria
202536.42 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F36
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Brussels Capital Region
Brussels Capital Region, Belgium
202542.32 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F37
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Flemish Region
Flemish Region, Belgium
202534.84 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F38
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Walloon Region
Walloon Region, Belgium
202530.20 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F39
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Prague
Prague, Czechia
202525.50 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F40
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Central Bohemian Region
Central Bohemian Region, Czechia
202513.47 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F41
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Southwest
Southwest, Czechia
202514.06 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F42
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Northwest
Northwest, Czechia
20259.47 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F43
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Northeast
Northeast, Czechia
202517.81 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F44
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Southeast
Southeast, Czechia
202515.49 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F45
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Central Moravia
Central Moravia, Czechia
202515.57 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F46
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Moravia-Silesia
Moravia-Silesia, Czechia
202515.72 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F47
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Copenhagen region
Copenhagen region, Denmark
202533.05 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F48
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Zealand
Zealand, Denmark
202542.73 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F49
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Southern Denmark
Southern Denmark, Denmark
202534.68 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F50
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Central Jutland
Central Jutland, Denmark
202550.82 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F51
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Northern Jutland
Northern Jutland, Denmark
202532.13 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F52
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Galicia
Galicia, Spain
202517.06 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F53
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Asturias
Asturias, Spain
202515.08 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F54
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Cantabria
Cantabria, Spain
202510.99 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F55
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Basque Country
Basque Country, Spain
202522.42 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F56
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Navarra
Navarra, Spain
202520.35 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F57
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — La Rioja
La Rioja, Spain
202514.61 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F58
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Aragon
Aragon, Spain
202512.68 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F59
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Madrid
Madrid, Spain
202527.42 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F60
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Castile and León
Castile and León, Spain
202517.13 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F61
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Castile-La Mancha
Castile-La Mancha, Spain
202518.93 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F62
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Extremadura
Extremadura, Spain
202514.88 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F63
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Catalonia
Catalonia, Spain
202524.04 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F64
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Valencia
Valencia, Spain
202519.82 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F65
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Balearic Islands
Balearic Islands, Spain
202511.87 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F66
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Andalusia
Andalusia, Spain
202515.83 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F67
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Murcia
Murcia, Spain
202515.09 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F68
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Canary Islands
Canary Islands, Spain
202515.85 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F69
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Pannonian Croatia
Pannonian Croatia, Croatia
202510.51 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F70
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Adriatic Croatia
Adriatic Croatia, Croatia
202510.98 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F71
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — City of Zagreb
City of Zagreb, Croatia
202525.44 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F72
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Northern Croatia
Northern Croatia, Croatia
202511.98 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F73
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Budapest
Budapest, Hungary
202517.66 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F74
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Pest
Pest, Hungary
20257.40 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F75
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Central Transdanubia
Central Transdanubia, Hungary
20257.72 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F76
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Western Transdanubia
Western Transdanubia, Hungary
20256.11 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F77
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Southern Transdanubia
Southern Transdanubia, Hungary
20257.98 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F78
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Northern Hungary
Northern Hungary, Hungary
20256.26 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F79
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Northern Great Plain
Northern Great Plain, Hungary
20255.48 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F80
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Southern Great Plain
Southern Great Plain, Hungary
20257.07 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F81
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Vilnius Region
Vilnius Region, Lithuania
202526.84 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F82
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Central and Western Lithuania
Central and Western Lithuania, Lithuania
202517.98 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F83
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Innlandet
Innlandet, Norway
202523.64 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F84
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Trøndelag
Trøndelag, Norway
202527.18 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F85
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Northern Norway
Northern Norway, Norway
202520.38 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F86
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Oslo and Viken
Oslo and Viken, Norway
202535.49 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F87
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Agder and Sør-Østlandet
Agder and Sør-Østlandet, Norway
202524.22 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F88
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Western Norway
Western Norway, Norway
202525.56 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F89
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Lesser Poland
Lesser Poland, Poland
20258.86 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F90
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Silesia
Silesia, Poland
20258.05 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F91
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Greater Poland
Greater Poland, Poland
20257.50 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F92
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — West Pomerania
West Pomerania, Poland
20257.92 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F93
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Lubusz
Lubusz, Poland
20255.58 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F94
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Lower Silesia
Lower Silesia, Poland
20259.68 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F95
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Opole region
Opole region, Poland
20257.40 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F96
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Kuyavian-Pomerania
Kuyavian-Pomerania, Poland
20256.36 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F97
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Warmian-Masuria
Warmian-Masuria, Poland
20254.53 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F98
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Pomerania
Pomerania, Poland
20259.24 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F99
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Lodzkie
Lodzkie, Poland
20257.57 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F100
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Swietokrzyskie
Swietokrzyskie, Poland
20255.31 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F101
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Lublin Province
Lublin Province, Poland
20255.86 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F102
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Podkarpacia
Podkarpacia, Poland
20257.02 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F103
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Podlaskie
Podlaskie, Poland
20255.56 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F104
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Warsaw
Warsaw, Poland
202515.99 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F105
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Mazowiecki region
Mazowiecki region, Poland
20252.94 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F106
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Stockholm
Stockholm, Sweden
202544.77 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F107
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — East Middle Sweden
East Middle Sweden, Sweden
202529.23 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F108
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Småland with Islands
Småland with Islands, Sweden
202529.53 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F109
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — South Sweden
South Sweden, Sweden
202531.32 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F110
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — West Sweden
West Sweden, Sweden
202537.08 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F111
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — North Middle Sweden
North Middle Sweden, Sweden
202522.09 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F112
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Central Norrland
Central Norrland, Sweden
202518.43 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F113
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Upper Norrland
Upper Norrland, Sweden
202531.51 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F114
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Bratislava Region
Bratislava Region, Slovak Republic
202528.36 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F115
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — West Slovakia
West Slovakia, Slovak Republic
202514.00 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F116
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — Central Slovakia
Central Slovakia, Slovak Republic
202514.00 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F117
oecd-regions-2026Enterprises using AI — East Slovakia
East Slovakia, Slovak Republic
202513.36 percentEnterprises with at least 10 persons employed in covered nonfinancial sectors; broad AI useFigure 1.9, worksheet Figure 1.9, F118
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Australia (2022)
2021–20221.4 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I10
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Korea (2024)
202420.8704433193799 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I11
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Italy
202510.1717 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I12
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Norway
202516.1432 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I13
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Sweden
202520.8595 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I14
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Poland
20255.2906 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I15
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Ireland
202513.4635 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I16
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Finland
202525.4826 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I17
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Japan (2023)
2021–20232.9417 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I18
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together — unweighted covered-country mean
OECD
2025 or most recent (2021–2025)12.2162086899778 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectors; unweighted mean of 28 country percentagesSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I19
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Netherlands
202523.7163 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I20
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Slovenia
202510.9384 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I22
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Germany
202512.9290999999999 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I23
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Austria
202511.1124 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I24
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Hungary
20255.7149 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I26
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Estonia
202516.1476 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I27
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Belgium
202522.7793 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I28
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Denmark
202529.9112 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I29
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Lithuania
202514.6097 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I30
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Latvia
20258.1669 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I31
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Czech Republic
202511.0392 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I32
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
France
20258.308 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I33
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Luxembourg
202514.291 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I34
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Slovak Republic
20258.634 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I35
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Portugal
20257.2088 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I36
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Spain
202510.6999 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I37
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Türkiye
20252.7536 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I38
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Greece
20254.6703 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I40
oecd-technology-couse-2026AI, cloud and data analytics together
Canada (2023)
20231.79999999999999 percentEnterprises with at least 10 employees in covered sectorsSource Figure 3.4, Tech co-occurencies_e!I42
census-btos-202622AI use in any business function
United States
2026-10-05/2026-10-1824.2 percentCovered nonfarm employer businesses; percentage of businesses, not employeesSource National.xlsx, Response Estimates!E16; Response Standard Errors!E16; cycle 202622
census-btos-202622Business reports employees using generative AI for work
United States
2026-10-05/2026-10-1826.8 percentCovered nonfarm employer businesses; percentage of businesses, not employeesSource National.xlsx, Response Estimates!E19; Response Standard Errors!E19; cycle 202622