Alessandro L. Piana Bianco
Strategic Innovation & Design — EU / MENA
Back to case studies

Pharma

Design thinking, internal platforms, and enablement—improving marketing operations, knowledge sharing, and field-team readiness at scale.

WorkshopsAlignment + co-creation
Marketing OpsAutomation processes
Intranet UXFindability + IA
EnablementSales training comms
GlobalMulti-region delivery
AdoptionGovernance + rollout

Boehringer Ingelheim — Design thinking workshops to reshape marketing automation processes

Focus: cross-functional alignment + marketing operations redesign + scalable governance

Problem
  • Marketing automation processes had grown fragmented across teams and regions, creating slow handoffs, inconsistent execution, and avoidable rework.
  • Stakeholders needed a shared view of the end-to-end process (intake → build → approvals → launch → optimisation) to improve reliability without compromising compliance constraints.
Role
  • Workshop lead and design facilitator responsible for agenda design, facilitation, synthesis, and turning outcomes into actionable artefacts.
  • Partnered with marketing, marketing operations, IT, and stakeholders to converge on ownership, standards and decision points.
Approach
  • Mapped current-state workflows and pain points, including handoffs, approvals, tooling frictions, and exception patterns.
  • Co-designed a future-state operating model with clearer roles, decision points, and service-level expectations for common requests.
  • Translated workshop outputs into a prioritised improvement backlog and roadmap, including quick wins and longer-term process changes.
Outcomes
  • Aligned stakeholders on a shared, end-to-end marketing automation workflow and clearer ownership across key steps.
  • Created a practical roadmap to reduce cycle time and inconsistencies through standardisation and governance improvements.
  • Improved clarity of exceptions and edge cases, reducing ambiguity in high-friction approval and launch moments.
Learnings
  • In complex marketing ops, the biggest performance gains often come from simplifying handoffs and clarifying decision rights—not new tools.
  • A lightweight governance model (standards + review checkpoints) is essential to keep automation quality consistent at scale.

Menarini — AI-driven chatbot for Prostamol within regulated drug promotion constraints

Focus: conversational UX + compliance guardrails + safe escalation patterns

Problem
  • Provide a helpful conversational entry point for consumers around the Prostamol product line while operating within strict rules for medicine promotion and public information.
  • Reduce ambiguity and risk in a chatbot experience: what can be said, how to handle sensitive questions, and how to route users to the right channel (HCP, medical information, or support) when needed.
Role
  • Led the experience definition of the chatbot: conversation structure, safety boundaries, content strategy, and interaction patterns for trust and clarity.
  • Worked with stakeholders (marketing, medical, legal/compliance, and delivery) to translate policy constraints into clear UX rules and release-ready requirements.
Approach
  • Defined conversation intents and “allowed content” zones (informational, support, escalation) with explicit do/don’t rules for each intent.
  • Designed guardrails and fallbacks: safe refusal patterns, re-phrasing prompts, and escalation flows to human support or medical information where appropriate.
  • Created a state model for sensitive moments (symptoms, adverse events, diagnosis-like questions) to protect users and the organisation through clarity and routing.
  • Prototyped key flows and aligned stakeholders via review sessions to ensure copy, states, and escalation paths were compliant and implementable.
Outcomes
  • Established a compliant conversational framework with clear intent taxonomy, UX guardrails, and escalation patterns suitable for regulated public-facing use.
  • Reduced delivery ambiguity by making constraints explicit (what is allowed, what triggers escalation, what requires refusal), enabling faster and safer iteration.
Learnings
  • For regulated conversational products, the “state model” is the product: safe defaults, refusal language, and escalation paths must be designed as carefully as happy paths.
  • Compliance becomes scalable when translated into reusable interaction rules and content patterns—not one-off reviews per prompt.

Pfizer — Global intranet and knowledge base design and usability enhancements

Focus: information architecture + findability + usability improvements for internal platforms

Problem
  • Teams struggled with findability and inconsistent navigation across a global intranet and knowledge base, slowing down day-to-day work and duplicating effort.
  • Content structure and governance needed improvement to support different roles and geographies without fragmentation.
Role
  • UX/design partner supporting assessment, design recommendations, and usability enhancement workstreams.
  • Collaborated with stakeholders across functions to understand needs, prioritise issues, and define improvement options.
Approach
  • Analysed navigation and information architecture pain points and identified high-impact areas for simplification.
  • Produced IA and interaction recommendations to improve findability (navigation, taxonomy cues, page templates, and content hierarchy).
  • Defined pragmatic governance guidance to support content quality and consistency over time.
Outcomes
  • Delivered a prioritised set of UX/IA enhancements designed to improve findability and reduce time-to-information for global teams.
  • Created clearer structure and guidance to support sustainable content evolution and reduce drift.
  • Improved consistency across key intranet patterns, making the platform easier to navigate and maintain.
Learnings
  • In knowledge platforms, small improvements to structure and naming can outperform large redesigns—especially when paired with governance.
  • Findability is a system property: navigation, taxonomy, templates and content ownership must work together.

Janssen — Design thinking workshops and communication strategy for training videos for sales reps

Focus: enablement strategy + workshop facilitation + adoption-oriented communication planning

Problem
  • Sales reps needed training content that was easy to adopt and apply in the field, supported by clear internal communication.
  • Stakeholders required alignment on learning goals, target behaviours, and rollout approach to avoid fragmented messaging.
Role
  • Facilitated design thinking workshops and contributed to the communication strategy for rollout and adoption.
Approach
  • Used workshops to clarify audience needs, constraints, and the moments that matter in rep enablement.
  • Defined a practical communication approach: what to communicate, when, through which channels, and with which ownership.
Outcomes
  • Aligned stakeholders on training priorities and a consistent communication approach to support adoption.
  • Provided rollout guidance to reduce confusion and improve consistency across regions/teams.

Johnson & Johnson — Strategy-level design thinking workshop

Focus: executive alignment + opportunity framing + decision artefacts

Problem
  • Leadership needed a structured way to align on priorities and translate broad strategic questions into actionable directions.
  • Multiple stakeholders required a shared problem frame and decision criteria to reduce churn and accelerate next steps.
Role
  • Workshop lead responsible for facilitation, synthesis, and executive-ready outputs that translate into follow-on work.
Approach
  • Structured the workshop around problem framing, ecosystem mapping, opportunity identification, and prioritisation against agreed criteria.
  • Captured decisions, assumptions and ownership to avoid re-litigating choices after the session.
Outcomes
  • Produced a shared problem frame and prioritised opportunity areas with clear next-step recommendations.
  • Improved alignment across stakeholders through decision artefacts that could be reused for planning and delivery.
Learnings
  • At strategy level, the most valuable workshop outputs are decision artefacts (principles, priorities, ownership), not concepts alone.
  • Clarity on criteria upfront reduces design-by-committee and speeds up convergence.